What Limbaugh Is Really About
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Too bad the Republican candidates had to comment on Rush Limbaugh’s flaming attack on a female law student at Georgetown University. El Rushbo plays troubadour to the party’s right wing from his home in its entertainment wing. The business of the entertainment wing is show business. That means making money off talk shows, books and TV appearances — and running the publicity machine at hysterical volume. It does not mean keeping the interests of the Republican Party foremost.
My take on Limbaugh is that he was losing his spotlight tan and needed a UV blast of attention. Thus the “conservative” radio personality called the self-possessed Sandra Fluke “a slut” and “a prostitute” for testifying in favor of requiring all employers to cover birth control. Elaborating further, he suggested that mandating coverage for contraceptives amounted to the public paying women to have sex. In return, the women should tape themselves in the act, he ventured, “and post the videos online so we can all watch.” Attention he got.
President Obama called Fluke and said he’d stand by her, while his press secretary characterized the attacks as “reprehensible.” But the Republican candidates — though already in hot water with many women voters — so feared Limbaugh’s wrath that they issued mild responses. Mitt Romney squeaked out that “it’s not the language I would have used.” Rick Santorum offered that “an entertainer can be absurd.” (Not just entertainers, Rick.)
Full disclosure: Limbaugh targets me on occasion. But though he’s said such unflattering things as “she might be stupid,” I don’t mind much. She who dishes it out should be able to take it. In any case, my right-wing friends are so mightily impressed when the Great One finds me worthy of notice, they invite me to lunch and pick up the check.
I confess to a tiny soft spot for Rush. In top form, he can amuse as well as irk. Meanwhile, he faces stiff competition, as others crowd the stage El Rushbo once dominated.
Sarah Palin was the Republican choice four years ago to stand one heartbeat away from the presidency. She’s now on Fox talking about the media getting “wee-weed” over Santorum’s Satan talk. Then there’s Ann Coulter, the late Andrew Breitbart and an army of industrious online provocateurs.
Climbing the greasy pole of the 24/7 right-wing news cycle requires finding increasingly violent ways to express contempt for liberals and their attitudes. But having been at this for a quarter of a century, Rush is getting a bit old hat. Next to what else is out there, his Angry White Male riffs seem almost staid. Hence, the graphic amplification at the expense of a poorly chosen victim.
It’s one thing to gargle vile things into the mike, even if they ultimately hurt the cause one purports to serve. It’s quite another to offend advertisers. When advertisers go, so does the money. Several advertisers, perhaps having eyed the exits for some time, pulled out after the offensive remarks. That alone explains Limbaugh’s eagerness to issue a rare regret.
Whether his media empire fully recovers remains to be seen. Abject apologies didn’t work too well for talk radio king Don Imus. In a similar verbal belch, he called the splendid Rutgers University women’s basketball team “nappy-headed hos.”
As for Limbaugh’s intended target, I imagine that she’s tougher than he is. And women not in the business of responding angrily to swipes at their gender are laughing at the shtoopidity.
Which makes me want to end with a gem from the Rush Limbaugh Treasury of Humor: “Women should not be allowed on juries where the accused is a stud.” Nyuck, nyuck, nyuck.
COPYRIGHT 2012 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
See Other Political Commentary.
See Other Commentaries by Froma Harrop.
Views expressed in this column are those of the author, not those of Rasmussen Reports.
Comments about this content should be directed to the author or syndicate.
Rasmussen Reports is a media company specializing in the collection,
publication and distribution of public opinion information.
We conduct public opinion polls on a variety of topics to inform our audience on events
in the news and other topics of interest. To ensure editorial control and independence,
we pay for the polls ourselves and generate revenue through the sale of subscriptions,
sponsorships, and advertising. Nightly polling on politics, business and lifestyle topics
provides the content to update the Rasmussen Reports web site many times each day.
If it’s in the news, it’s in our polls. Additionally, the data drives a
daily update newsletter,
the Rasmussen Report on radio
and other media outlets.
Some information, including the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll
and commentaries are available for free to the general public.
Subscriptions are available for $3.95 a month or 34.95 a year
that provide subscribers with exclusive access to more than 20 stories per week on Election 2012,
consumer confidence, and issues that affect us all. For those who are really into the numbers,
Platinum Members can review demographic crosstabs
and a full history of our data.
president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.
To learn more about our methodology, click here.