Fee fi fo fum. Big bad Bibi is coming to DC town — and Barack is VERY angry. Not only that, and possibly worse, Jeffrey Goldberg at The Atlantic may be equally as angry. The journalist insists Netanyahu making a speech to Congress at the speaker’s invitation is a “disaster” or — in the words of my grandmother — “not good for the Jews.” And Jeff should know. He’s an important guy, I am told. He gets to talk… to Barack.
Goldberg accuses Netanyahu of electioneering (a rare thing indeed for a politician) and not showing the proper “RESPECT” for our president (cue Aretha), who always demonstrates so much respect for the Israeli prime minister.
Excuse me while I rend my clothes. Meanwhile, lost in Goldberg’s posturing, and the funfkeying by such great State Department intellects as Jen Psaki, is the subject of Netanyahu’s putative speech. What was it? Oh, yes… Iran. Now I remember. That country that has its hand in nearly every piece of Islamic mayhem from Buenos Aires to Sanaa.
Oh, wait. I made another mistake. I said Islamic mayhem. That’s a no-no for Goldberg’s hero. I meant, um, “workplace violence.” Better? Good. The death of Alberto Nisman in Argentina was “workplace violence,” no? He was at work, investigating the coverup of the terror bombing of that Buenos Aires Jewish center that killed 85 and wounded over 300 by Hezbollah or whoever it was. They’re not Islamic, are they?
Read more by Roger L. Simon at PJMedia